A TRUCKER dad is furious after a "petty" council refused a loft extension on his home.
Pavinder Rittu, 47, planned to put another room in his three-bed semi above the garage to house his growing family.
But despite neighbours in Oldbury, West Mids., doing exactly the same, Sandwell council said the dad's project would "harm" the character of the area and not fit in.
The 47-year-old dad-of-three told The Sun Online: "This isn’t Mayfair.
"This isn’t an exclusive development, it’s just an ordinary, working class road where loads of the houses have been extended and there is no uniformity."
From tongue scraping to saying no, here are 12 health trends to try in 2023
The dad said he only got the idea of a loft conversion from the house opposite.
As well as a bedroom, he also hoped to put a snooker table up there so he can play against his three boys.
But despite his plans copying at least three other neighbours' extensions, the council chucked them out saying his conversion would not mirror the house next door.
And they claimed other projects on the road had been "a mistake" and his was "unsymmetrical and unbalanced", so Pavinder was given his marching orders.
"I don’t understand why they are being like this. All the roads around here are a mix... It is just so petty", the dad fumed.
"I am just trying to create a nice home for my family."
It is now five years since Pavinder started his home improvements.
But the decision has left the dad unable to move his family in for two years - with the project now just an empty shell.
To add insult to injury, his back garden is covered in rubble and it's an eye-sore at the front.
'NOT FAIR'
Neighbour, Belinda Bissell, 38, a support worker, said she felt "really sorry for him".
Spectacular New Year fireworks light up London sky as huge crowds celebrate across UK for first time in three years
She added: "It is not fair to say that someone can’t build an extension unless their neighbour has done the same thing."
But one neighbour, who asked not to be named, was less sympathetic, highlighting holes in the eaves meant squirrels were chewing wires in the adjoining property.
They explained: "We had to call in pest control for the squirrels and it was just awful hearing them dying in our loft.
"It has been a mess at the back for years now. I hope he gets it sorted but there are rules for a reason and we all have to adhere to them."
Pavinder added: "I feel sorry for my neighbours because it doesn’t look good and they just want it finished. They have been really good to us."
'UNSYMMETRICAL'
A planning inspector, K Townsend, visited the Oldbury property in November last year and said that while matching materials would be used to develop the property, it would be “unsymmetrical and unbalanced” and result in harm to the character of the area.
He added that the appeal proposal would substantially alter the appearance of one half of the pair of semi-detached houses, and stated that other homes with similar extensions were all carried out under permitted development rights and not approved by the council
Mr Townsend concluded: "The wider benefits of homeowners extending and altering their homes is not quantified and, even if I were to accept that there was a benefit, this does not outweigh the harm identified above.
"For the above reasons, having had regard to the development plan as a whole, along with all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed."
A Sandwell council spokesperson said: "The application was refused planning approval on 01.06.2022 under application reference DC/22/66837.
"The application was determined using delegated powers and did not need to go to the council’s planning committee.
"The applicant then appealed the refusal to the Planning Inspectorate (independent of the local authority), which dismissed the appeal on 07.12.22.
"This confirmed the local planning authority was correct in refusing the application on design grounds.
"This decision of the Planning Inspectorate will be reported to the council’s planning committee today.
"With regards to the ‘similar roof conversions on the same road’ - under permitted development rights, a householder can undertake a hip to gable conversion without the requirement for planning approval (subject to limitations and conditions contained within the General Permitted Development Order) when this applies to the original roof only.
"This does not apply to two storey side extensions where planning permission is required."
